Why the US Rejected Medium-Sized Aircraft Carriers

Popular Facts

Despite the proposed advantages of the average aircraft carrier, the disadvantages of the smallest platform finally made it unattractive. The benefits of larger vessels were so important that, as you could pay larger boats, the Navy would continue buying.

The ten nuclear superfers of the Navy of the United States are the greatest wars of the War on the High Seas. Home to more than five thousand sailors and sailors, Nimitz class carriers are nuclear propulsion and can transport a combat aircraft of 3 eighty and Dix. However, it should not be this way: I would have taken the sailor another mistake in several decades ago in several decades ago, the gigantic boats would have been completed with smaller and more profitable applications, the average aircraft carriers.

During the Second World War, the US Navy. UU offered two types of carriers: fleet carriers and companion carriers. The main carriers included the main offensive shot of the fleet, a mixture of fighters, diving bombers and torpedo bombers. The companion carriers or "jeep" were a measure of strength savings, smaller glasses with smaller air wings designed to provide excessive transport transport and fleet conveyors when the largest ships worked elsewhere.

After the war, the Navy has operated a range of carriers, carriers of full size fleets, such as the company of the United States, attack carriers and anti-republic carriers of the ESSEX class of war. Gradually, like older and smaller carriers, they were replaced by Supercarrières. A smaller carrier was not built and in the mid-1980s, almost all US marine carriers had at least a thousand feet long, with the exception of the United States Midway and the Coral Sea USS.